The Cold War In Welfare Stock Markets Versus Pensions

Author: Richard Minns

Stock information

General Fields

  • : $75.00 AUD
  • : 9781859846254
  • : Verso Books
  • : Verso Books
  • :
  • : 0.462211
  • : 01 May 2001
  • : .94 Inches X 6.3 Inches X 8.14 Inches
  • :
  • : 39.99
  • :
  • :
  • :
  • : books

Special Fields

  • :
  • :
  • : Richard Minns
  • :
  • : Hardback
  • :
  • :
  • : English
  • : 331.25/2
  • :
  • :
  • : 240
  • :
  • :
  • :
  • :
  • :
  • :
  • :
  • :
Barcode 9781859846254
9781859846254

Local Description

2001, First edition. A fine, unmarked copy in a fine, unclipped d/w. Scans available if required

Description

A new Cold War has developed between competing blocs of countries over the role of financial markets versus the state in the provision of pensions and the financing of the economy generally. An Anglo-American bloc, which has spread into South America, Australia, Canada and Japan, favors private pension investment on stock markets. Proponents of this approach argue that it will be much more efficient and provide capital for corporate growth. A European bloc, which covers most European countries other than the UK, favours state provision and a much smaller role for stock markets in pensions' provision and in corporate relations with the financial sector. This model is, unsurprisingly, under threat from the World Bank, financial markets, and many senior academics in the US and Britain. This book is the first to analyse comprehensively this situation. It argues that social provision and corporate relationships with the financial sector are inextricably linked, and moreover that the expansion of private pensions through stock markets has all the attendant consequences for the control of companies by investors on those markets who want to maximize individual financial returns as opposed to corporate growth. Indeed, the book comes to the conclusion that many of the arguments used in support of the Anglo-American approach are based not on improving pensions and economic growth but rather on how to promote stock markets themselves, a decidedly different matter.